Pastoral Care and Soul Care

Pastors have been designated to offer spiritual counsel since the early days of the church. Today we think of it as a recent trend from the past. Pastoral counseling has since grown up alongside psychological counseling, seeking to find its identity against the healing or therapeutic culture. Pastoral counseling has become a modern treatment than the traditional soul caring as pastors have distanced from psychological counseling and have now tended to offer biblical counsel living psychological counseling to the trained psychologists. Biblical counsel encompasses soul care which is caring of the human soul. Soul care contains the idea of both care and cure of the soul. Care is the things that are done to support the well being of a person or something. The church has since being involved in restoration and healing process of the people in the church as they also seek to nurture them and cure their souls. Much of the focus is targeted to the soul of a human person. In this case the soul is viewed as the whole inner person, thus soul care is caring of the human person in his inner fullness which is given a priority in the spiritual and psychological aspects of the persons world. Soul care is not always addressed on the problems but nurturing of the whole person (Benner 1998). Soul care has always being the primary focus of the church. Therefore its basically comprised of four elements healing, sustaining, reconciling and guiding the human person. (Strategic pastoral counseling, Benner, David G. 2003).

Pastors are the vessels chosen to deliver the care of Gods grace to the needy people in the souls. Its not just by mere coincidence but its through Gods grace that one is able to care for others and guide them. Pastors are distinguished by the uniqueness of others being attracted to them just by the virtue of kindness and humility to serve others souls. Biblically stated Help to carry others burdens and in this way you will obey the law of Christ (Gal 62). It also got something to do with the compassionate understanding that relates to others as a living testimony that they have also gone through hard times and have not given up or turned their self in but walked in faith. This helps encourage others that them too can be impacted and overcome as them. We should give thanks to God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Merciful Father, The God from whom all help comes from, He helps us in all our troubles so that we are able to help others who have all kinds of troubles, using the same help that we ourselves have received from God (2nd Corinthians. 13-4) .If this is done with integrity and consistency then one is considered to be a trustworthy servant in whom God delights and blesses. All this is the work of a pastor whose soul business is the good guidance and caring of souls as entitled in the biblical view point. (The quick reference guide to biblical counseling, Clinton, Tim, and Ron Hawkins. 2009).

Many times when we seek soul care, we are seeking personal growth and this is related to our hurting in one way or the other. We seriously seek to solve our personal mysteries of life through soul care. By relating to a person and seeing who he or she is, how he or she is hurt and stuck to the situation is all part and parcel of soul care. Helping others overcome emotional detachment, passivity, negative thinking and all the things in the dark side of life is what pastors are graced to do. But to a narrower perspective there are trained psychologists to do the same over time. When this is catered for suffering ceases and a person exposes his or her focus on him or her self. Pastors have been proudly regarded as God sent people, who have a God given ability and obligation to show others how to grow spiritually and what steps to take. As they play their part we also have to play ours and do as they show us because that is what really God has intended us to do. This is just but a pathway of discovering Gods purposes for our lives slowly by slowly. And with this soul given care we are highly favored and graced according to His ever unending mercies. It is not easy to do it alone but God has surely given us pastors to nurture us fully in His spirit.( Nine things you must simply do to succeed in life A psychologist probes the mystery of why some lives really work and others dont, Cloud, Henry. 2004)

Breaking Down Pastoral Counseling With Regards to Soul Care

Many Christians worldwide often encounter and clash with many concepts, theories, practices, and doctrines in their quest for how best to live a life of spiritual fulfillment. Such Christians find themselves in a fix while trying to get knowledge to avoid doom (Hosea 46). These dilemmas do not spare even the ministers of God who seek to enrich their knowledge in Pastoral Counseling, since they find themselves weighing between what they believe in, what the church believes in, and what the secular world considers best. (Benner 2003, 13) tends to think that Pastoral counseling can be both distinctively pastoral and psychologically informed. This means that there is a possibility of a pastor conducting counseling to remain in Christian context, regardless of a situation seeming to warrant a secular solution. We should remember the Holy Spirit should be our counselor and we should possess a spirit of discernment (1st Kings 39).

Christian Soul Care
Benner 2003, 14-28 says that Christian Soul Care is the support and restoration of the wellbeing of a person in their depth and in totality with particular concern to their inner life. It is also said that for care to be worthy of being referred to as soul care, then it has to engage four aspects namely sustaining, guiding, healing and reconciling  (William and Charles 1964, 12). The soul is the most special part in the composition of a human being and is believed to retain life even after the death of the physical body. This serves to show that it deserves special care to preserve it. Therefore if we are able to offer the support needed to the wellbeing of our inner-man in totality, then we would be able to offer the restoration needed to every member of the congregation and this would re-energize the congregation and they would offer all their worship and praise to God as Psalms 1501-5 instructs. In accordance to McNeil 1951, vii, we should also offer a presentation of all people perfect in Christ, to God, by giving counsel, offering consolidation, preach sermons, write books and letters, visit people, develop and run hospitals, organize schools, offer education and engage in social and political activities (Benner 2003, 15).

Forms of Soul Care
Soul Care is categorized into five forms that are mentioned to be pastoral counseling, spiritual direction, pastoral care, pastoral ministry and Christian friendship (Benner 1998, 11). Christian friendship ensures fellowshipping of believers through sharing and interaction. Pastoral care offers a helping hand to the congregation to build their faith it also goes hand in hand with spiritual direction, which ensures focus in the correct spiritual path. On the other hand, pastoral counseling is the guidance given to the congregation to show them a path of Biblical truth for the Bible says in John 832 And they shall know the truth and the truth shall free them. Pastoral ministries ensure there is always a sanctuary where the congregation can go to be nurtured in time of need. The latter two work together to ensure that when we submit our situations for counseling, we are handled with utmost care and compassion because at that point we are very vulnerable and fragile.

Case Study Applications of Soul Care and their Impacts
In my church, soul care is handled very delicately by my pastor, who understands that how well he deals with my situation will determine whether I will go back to him for more help or not. He understands that for me to lead a spiritual life of fulfillment I need to be realistic with Gods word and thus I need to be up-to-date with what God wants. This approach has ensured that the congregations understand the need for their Praise and Worship in all situations. On a personal level, understanding myself and how I should live a life of spirituality has caused me to be a very confident individual and to be able to offer help and advice to those I find in difficult situations.

Uniqueness of Pastoral Counseling
On the uniqueness of pastoral counseling, Benner says that The training of ministers is distinctive because it provides pastoral counselors with a spiritual perspective on persons and their problems (Benner 2003, 31). Spiritual perspective in this case means how we view or perceive issues that relate to our spirituality and how we relate to them. Pastoral counseling can therefore not be effective unless it incorporates first being very particular to context needed for each scenario with regards to each individual case, secondly it has to involve setting of goals which encompass a spiritual insight related to each scenario, then there is the determining of the role of the pastoral counselor as either the solution or direction giver, and finally, the resources that are needed for the counseling to be successful. Benner 2003, 29 comments that pastoral counseling is very unique in its incorporation of religious resources which he says are prayer, anointing with oil, sacraments, laying of hands, religious literature and scripture.

Conclusion Rationale
Brief pastoral counseling is suggested by Benner 2003, 42-45 as the best approach because he argues that many pastors are either not well equipped or they are too busy to handle a long-term counseling approach. Moreover, a long-term counseling model may not appeal to the church member, who might also be too busy or they may find the approach boring due to the monotony offered by the many sessions. We may also find a scenario where the church member is seeking a quick solution, and lengthening the process may leave them more confused and disillusioned. I therefore think that a short-term model for pastoral counseling is the most ideal for any type of pastoral counseling.

Movie Reflection and Analysis SAVED

The film Saved dealt on one of the most common issue in the religious circles and debates  the question on the interpretation of the words of God in the bible and the discrimination on the people who did not abide in the words of God. In this paper, with the help of the film and the analysis of the situation in the real world, we are going to argue that groups who are literal in interpreting the Bible have to make adjustments for them to continuously save souls.

In the film, the Bible became the central and decisive element for almost all of the actions, judgments and goals of the characters. Whether it is acting for or acting against the Bible, the story rotated on the way characters or the institution per se (i.e. the school) interpreted what is written in the book.

Characters like Pastor Skip, Mary and the Christian Jewels (e.g. Hilary Faye) tried to determine their actions depending on what the Bible says or what they interpreted the Bible says. For characters like Mary, Roland and Cassandra, they were judged in relation to what the Bible speaks of or what the people in authority interpret on what the Bible is saying (i.e. Pastor Skip, Hilary Faye). In the story, everything rotated on the interpretation of the words of God that were written on the Bible.

The American Eagle Christian School almost became an ultimate haven for the people who blindly and rigidly followed the teachings on the Bible. Though the school is not entirely exclusive for Christians or Protestants, non-believers are discriminated by the population itself. The case of Cassandra who was a reckless and liberated student is an example of this discrimination. Though the discrimination for her is not as common as what we can commonly interpret as discrimination, we can clearly see how the population of the school reacts to her. Almost all of them want to change her to be one of them. For the rest of the population, until Cassandra becomes one of them, she will be seen as an outcast on the school.

This biblical literalism and the bias on the non-believers and sinners was later seen when Mary was discovered to be pregnant. As seen on the film, she was advised to be taken care of in the Mercy House. It is important to note that earlier in the story her boyfriend was taken care of in the Mercy House by his parents because of being gay. The Mercy House is the place wherein sinful people or kids were taken to be disciplined. It is also a place wherein gray areas in the teachings are brought to be not dealt by the church or school administration.

If there is one issue that dominated the entire story that affected almost all of the characters, it is the rigidness and stiffness of the interpretation on the teachings of God. For most of the population, issues on life are only either black or white without any gray areas. Directly quoted from Pastor Skip, he said that, The Bible is black and white. These people interpreted the teachings in the Bible as something that is stiff, direct and authoritative. The people who walk away or even divert for even a single degree from these adapted teachings will be seen as outcasts and will be discriminated. This kind of approach of the school administration, with the consent of the population managed to establish the Mercy House wherein outcast or sinners shall be sent for disciplinary actions.

This kind of approach, in relation to the events in the film and to what is happening in the real modern world had managed to exclude numerous people. With the rise of modernity and advance of technology in addition to the shift in paradigm of most of the people in the globe, the biblical literalism of many religious groups had brought conflict and strife to numerous groups of people. The biblical literalism had managed to exclude numerous people. It also made possible the formulation of the us and the them. It is not these outcasts do not believe on God or deny His existence. They believe on God, however, the situation is no longer as straight forward and direct to the point as before. The modern reality had brought numerous gray areas that are yet to be resolved. Issues includes premarital sex, homosexuality and abortion are some of the common concerns of these people.

The question here is simple. Are these groups who have a stiff and rigid interpretation of the Bible must loosen up their grasp on their interpretation for even a little bit Is the common black and white or evil and good distinction still hold on today Will the outcast be left to rot outside until they accept the rigid interpretations of the Bible

From here, I argue that Yes, there should be a shift in attitude in interpreting the words of God. Since time and memorial or since the rules of religion were established, there are thousands or even millions of changes that happened in our society. Changes includes the way we dress, the way we communicate, the way we are governed and even the way we work. These societal arrangements managed to produce entirely new kinds or groups of people. It is difficult to argue that the environment and society of yesterday who relies on stone and fire for their survival will produce the same people that have the capability to adapt the teachings of the Bible then. The world had changes so much since then. Fire and stone can longer sustain our lives.

What I am advocating is not a complete shift in attitude in dealing with the words of God that were written in the Bible or a completely liberal approach in the situation. What I am proposing is a more liberal or open discussion of the issues that are arising for every individual that wants to join the religious groups. Rather than closing the doors right away and sending these people to the Mercy house if there is one, it would be better if we are going to take a look and investigate the specificity of every situation. It is important to note that not all that is happening to a person happened by his or her choice, whether it is teen pregnancy or homosexuality, in many cases, we can argue that he did not choose it to happen. The best thing is to see their situation in a new light, a light that is deprived of biases of universality and literalism. In this way, we can be able to become closer to them and shall be given a chance to turn them in the process.

The world had changed so much in the last thousand years of evolution. It is not the environment that only changed, deep within us we changed dramatically than our forefathers. In many cases, it is possible that the things that they believed before can be harder for us to obey because of these changes. In these cases, an open minded investigation is necessary. Only, in this respect we can expect a modern society that is closer to God.

World View on Eastern Pantheism

Eastern Pantheism holds as its tenets that nature has a soul and that God can be found anywhere. Pantheism is derived from the word pan which means all-encompassing or universal and theism, coming from the Greek theos which signifies God. Eastern pantheistic religions such as Hinduism, Buddhism, and Daoism venerate nature as a sacred entity (Totten 2000).

Life DomainsWorld view
Money and CareerHinduism has a renunciation principle which preaches the non-attachment of devotees to the things of the world. Materialism and self-aggrandizement are discouraged. The objective of life has to be in sacrifice in order to benefit in the world hereafter. At the same time, diligence and industry are disciplines laid out in the Bhagavad Gita which liberates the soul from sloth and mediocrity (Leffel 2009)Sexuality DomainThe Eastern pantheistic view on sexuality is centralized in its theme of fertility, gods and goddess, and malefemale principles. Hinduism, Buddhism and Daoism promote the worship of sex, and laud female and male gods. The malefemale principles are inextricable similar to Yin and Yan, Krisha and Lakshmi. Union of both, symbolizing intercourse, generates life through reproduction (Hindu Goddesses)

Family Life DomainThe Dao aspect of Eastern Pantheism teaches that divine and everlasting means the way of nature and the cosmos thus one sees the bond between the universe and man. The founder of Daoism, Laozi lived in the sixth century BCE and developed the rudiments of Daoism. However, during the Period of the Warring States (403  221 BCE), Daoism further consolidated its base of doctrines and grew as a peace-making entity which stood for order. Mans harmony with nature corresponds with the harmony of the cosmos. This concept is mirrored in the affirmation that that state of being in accord with nature is (being) in accord with Dao. There exists compatibility, coexistence and harmony with opposite natures and this relation is called harmonious dualism. Hence family and human relations must be pacific and harmonious (Robinson 2006) Comparison to Christianity

The Bible is overtly against pantheism, declaring in Romans 121, Professing to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed animals and crawling creatures. Therefore God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, that their bodies might be dishonored among them. For they exchanged the truth of God for a lie and worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.

Conclusion
Clearly, based on the Word of God, Eastern pantheism clashes with Gods commands and encourages the worship of the creature rather than the Creator. The proliferation of rodents and sickness in India attest to that fact, where animals are treated with more dignity and respect than mankind (Elephants, cows, goats, mice, and rats run freely in temples and marketplaces unhindered). The concept of reincarnation is popular in eastern pantheism since after death, man evolves into another being in nature plant or animal.

AssumptionEastern PantheismReality In the Eastern Worldview, the ultimate Reality (the One) is impersonal, infinite, non-material, and non-conceptual. Here, the ultimate Reality represents a type of god called Brahman. Pantheists believe that the god-connection is not personal neither does god have any features similar to man (love, anger, etc). Brahman who is the ultimate reality is also non-material, i.e, cannot be present in the flesh and holds no distinct characteristics. He cannot be defined or interpreted because he is infinite. (Lim)KnowledgeEastern Pantheism posits that the zenith of human knowledge is nirvana where the mind is at rest and unattached from worldly concerns. The principle of maya explains that there are no dichotomies hence good and evil, right and wrong, physical and spiritual (any opposite elements are fictional and illusive). Adviya or ignorance which begets separation from Brahman is to be shunned. Ignorance is the only sin that separates the soul from realizing his true goal to be illuminated (Coward 2007)Human natureIn Eastern pantheism, the human soul or spirit is called the atman. God in within each human being and through meditation, man finds the god within and becomes unified with Brahman, the infinite therefore man is god and has the potential to be like God. The atman (human soul) is an unconscious and eternal element in the body which needs to be enlightened (Waite 1997 128)Human problemsEastern pantheism poses that problems stem from the things of the world such as greed, self-indulgence, loathing, etc (Billington 2007 62)Solutions to human problemsThe solution to human problems comes in the form of non-attachment. Liberation lies in doing ones duty without hope of reward or fear of punishment (Totten 2000).Human valueHuman value is centered on the appreciation of good deeds and the non-attachment to worldly distractions. Human purposeThe Eastern Pantheistic worldview embraces man whose prime life object is to be enlightened, achieving Nirvana or Moksha which is the point of extinguishment. In other words, the existence of unwanted vices such as hatred, envy, self-indulgence, and deception perish. Nirvana is the equivalent of heaven where man attains his peak enlightenment, where his mind cannot be tainted by worldly considerations and his becomes at peace. (Frankfort 1978).Ethics Ethics from the Eastern pantheistic perspective involves the absence of good and evil. There is no moral categorization therefore, good and evil cease to exist.  Since enlightenment is the ultimate goal of the devotee, the difference between light and darkness is non-essential. The code of ethics is defined as far as the end is achieved. Doing good helps one to ascend the rungs of righteousness and enlightenment. Suffering Human suffering is caused by samsara which is bondage to the human chronological cycle of birth, death, and rebirth to which every being is subjected. The only way for freedom is by breaking this cycle, where the atman (human soul) is set free and finally united to the Brahman. Suffering is also a product of negative values such as lust, strife, etc. (Lim)The meaning of lifeThe meaning of life is gotten by doing charitable deeds so that in the life to come (at the point of reincarnation) the transformed creature would be favorable (a better station than ones current position). The law of kharma stipulates that one gets what one gives. (Billington 2007).Human desireHuman desire is something that should be spurned since attachment of any sort to an entity comprises enslavement. This bond between the self and an object of desire fosters the imprisonment which denies the individual the opportunity of having a real, mystical, religious, experience. (Groothius 1986).

DISCOVERING EPHESUS

Ephesus, a city symbolizing the greatness of history now lies mysterious and underground beneath the many stories that abound upon it. A place of popularity centuries before Christ and even after His death, it is but natural for archeologists and historians to take interest in its excavation.  For common people such as this student, however, it presents not only a paper to research about but a road to rediscovering one s faith.

Ephesus lies on the western part of Turkey. Historians believe that Ephesus was first discovered by the Athenian, Androclos,  who was protecting his people from the Dor invasion in Greece.  Guided by the symbols of a fish and a boar predicted in an oracle, Androclos  knew he was on the right track when a fish they were frying fell off their pan and irritated a boar hiding in the bushes.1 He immediately ran after it and killed it, marking the site where he caught the boar as the  place to build his new kingdom, Ephesus.  The city reached its golden age in mid-6 BC under the rule of the Lydian king, Kreisos and was a center of culture and arts as evidenced by the temple and grand statue of Artemis, their goddess of Fertility. The temple was believed to have been burnt down by an insane man, Herostratus, who merely wanted his name to go down in history.  Legend has it that on that same night that the temple was engulfed in flames, Alexander the  Great was born. As he rose to rule an empire, Alexander offered to rebuild the temple but the proud Ephesians discreetly turned him down saying he, as a god, can not build a temple for another god. Upon Alexander s death, his general, Lysimakhos, moved the city s
--------------------
 Ephesus History-I.  Ephesus available from httpwww.ephesus.usephesusephesus_  history.htm.

location further west and renamed it after his wife, Arsinoeina.2 The people later changed it back to its former name.  After the death of Christ, the city again became the hub of commerce and
 culture being the central gateway to Asia especially under the reign of  Augustus. It was a very rich city with about 225,000 residents making it the fourth largest city at that time. Ephesus became famous in the Bible because Saint Paul decided to preach at the temple of Artemis.  The letters of St. Paul to the Ephesians, a major volume in the New Testament part of the Bible, strengthens the importance of this city. The disciple, St. John, and the Blessed Virgin Mary were also known to have resided in Ephesus after Christ died.  At around 1307, the River Caystros that gave Ephesus its importance in sea trade became silted up and this led to the decline of the city s popularity.

The richness of its history spanning centuries of cultural change makes Ephesus a  prime target for  archeologists to discover more about how man used to live and for the faithful to increase their knowledge about Christianity. Various archeological groups have been continuously trying to excavate the area since the 1860s but objectives on discovering more artifacts have lately taken a side step towards preservation of what had already been dug up. 

The first to get permission for his excavations of Ephesus was British engineer J.T. Wood who convinced the British Museum that he can find the Temple or Artemis. Woods discovered remnants of the theater and dug from 1866-1868 until his sponsor, the British Museum,  threatened to cease his funding if he does not find the temple. He fortunately found the walls of
--------------------
Ibid.

the temple on April 1869.3  From 1904 onwards, D.G. Hogarth continued Wood s search for the temple and upon further examination realized that the earlier platform Woods had found is but the surface of a more magnificint discovery for beneath its center the remains of three yet older structures were there.4  In 1895, Otto Benndorf, through the Austrian Archeological Institute, was able to get the permission of the Ottoman Sultan to excavate. Until this day, the Austrian Archeological Institute has been excavating for relics and had only two interruptions in the lieu of World Wars I and II..  In 1954, archeologists of the Ephesus Museum have joined forces with the Austrian Archeological Institute.  Due to its importance as a tourist attraction, Turkey s Ministry of Culture and Tourism created the program  Selcuk-Ephesuus Excavations,  Restorations, and Sytematization of its Environs  in 1979.5 The most recent formal report on the findings and state of preservation of the relics was given by the Austrian Archeological Institute last January 25, 2010 at the second Ephesus Symposium in Istanbul after a five month excavation period in 2009.  13 different sites were concentrated on for more discoveries and

----------------------------
Terry Richardson Antalya, Digging Up Turkeys Past Unearthing Ephesus with John Turtle Wood  available from httpwww.todayszaman.comtz-webmobile.doloadwapDetaylink198967.

Facts about David George Hogarth  HYPERLINK httpwww.britannica.comEBcheckedtopic189556Ephesus2126Excavations-and-extant-remains available from httpwww.britannica.comfacts 5133182David-George-Hogarth-as-discussed-in-Ephesus-ancient-city-Turkey.

 Excavations in Ephesus.  Ephesus available from httpwww.ephesus.usephesusephesus_excavations.htm.

preservation projects by a team comprised of 174 academicians from 11 different countries.6  To this date, only an estimated ten percent of the total city had been excavated.

Although much has been said about the opulence of Ephesus, its historical importance is much greater for Christians because it is believed that the Blessed Virgin Mary spent her last years in the city.  There was a legend that Mary lived and died in Ephesus, but this was also true of Timothy and Mary Magdalene and Mary appears no more than any other saint in the artifacts and inscriptions uncovered so far.

The writer finds that many have sought to establish that the Blessed Virgin had laid her life to rest in Ephesus but no archeological evidence points to this as a fact.  Maybe it is true.  Maybe it is not.  The mystery of Ephesus has been kept underground for centuries.  Its opulence and majesty can be read all over history books as much as the greatness of God has been declared by many.  One realizes that faith is not and should not be grounded on artifacts and evidences but on the strength of believing... believing that something is real beyond any physical manifestation it can project.   Ephesus may hold so many secrets as to its relevance to the Christian faith but this writer concludes that it is merely a symbol that suggests one to believe that life is a wonder to discover.
---------------------
Austrian Cultural Forum Istanbul, Ephesus Results of recent excavations presented in Istanbul available from httpwww.bmeia.gv.atenforeignministrynewspresseaussendungen 2010ephesos-praesentation-der-juengsten-grabungsergebnisse-in-istanbul.html.

Holly Hayes, The Virgin Mary In Ephesus available from httpwww.sacred-destinations.comturkeyephesus-virgin-mary.htm.

William Foxwell Albright

William Foxwell Albright was born in 1891 and died eighty years later in 1971. He was born in Chile, where his parents were missionaries. Poor eye sight as a child meant he did not often join other children in play. Instead he turned to his fathers library. The family returned to the United State of America in 1903. Always a scholar,, his skills meant that he obtained his doctorate in Semitic languages at the very early age of 22 in 1913.  From 1929  1958 he taught at John Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, where he was the professor of Semitic Languages,  while, for much of that time, also being director  of the American School of  Oriental Research in Jerusalem, now re-named as  The W. F. Albright Institute of Archaeological Research. He held the latter post from 1921 to 29 and again from 1933-6. He was also the senior editor of the Anchor Bible series for the fifteen years from 1956 until he died in 1971 as well as making contributions to important definitive reference books such as the Cambridge University Press , The Cambridge Ancient History. According to his sentry in the New World Encyclopedia he was concerned with-

The social and political structure, the religious concepts and practices and
other human activities and relationships that are found in the Bible or pertain
 to peoples mentioned in the Bible.

Following the example of  Sir William Flinders Petrie, who worked  in Southern Israel from 1890 onwards, Albright was able to establish a systematic way of dating pottery found in Palestine, as when Tell Beit  Mirsim, to the south west of Hebron in Jordan, was excavated  in the years from 1926-36.  His earliest archaeological investigations had as their focus the historicity of the Patriarchs. As late as 1961 he was able to utilize much of his knowledge on this subject , gathered over many years, in his article Abram the Hebrew, a new archeological perspective.  In 1922 he had worked at the site of Gibeah ( Tell el ful, meaning hill of beans ) He would also work at other sites such as Beth-Zur, Bethel and Petra , the great  trading city of the Nabateans, in Jordan. Although best known, and mainly concerned with biblical archeology, he was also able to make  his contribution to knowledge about other near eastern subjects. He helped to establish a correct dating for Hammurabi in Babylon, when he argued with other scholars that their interpretation of a Mari letter was incorrect, His paper entitled, New Light from Egypt on the Chronology and History of Israel and Judah, was concerned with dating  the Egytian pharoah Shishak, a contemporary of Soloman who began to rule at some point  from  945 and 940 B.C.E. He laid the foundation of the understanding of ancient West Semitic cultures, in particular  the religion of the Cananites. For all these reasons  he was referred to as The Great Authenticator because, among other things, it was he who identified, the Dead Sea Scroll as being authentic, despite his poor eye sight. In 1948, having only seen a photograph up to that point, of the scroll of Isaiah, he wrote to John C. Trevor at the at American Schools of Oriental Research in Jerusalem in March 1948 -

I repeat that in my opinion you have made the greatest manuscript discovery
of modern times---certainly the greatest biblical manuscript find...What an incredible find
There were in fact some 15,000 fragments making up texts from 574 original manuscripts. The particular text concerned, a complete copy of the prophecy of Isaiah,  which had been shown to Trevor by a Syrian Orthodox monk about a year after the original discovery of the scrolls,  was the oldest  Hebrew text  discovered up to that time.

Some of his work was instinctive, as when he studied a letter, believed by others to be from the Bronze Age, that is some 4,000 years ago. According to Dale Keiger he just sensed that something was wrong. Only recently has he been proved right. Keiger says of him -
The Bible, before William Foxwell Albright, was exempt from critical appraisal It was simply Gospel.

He goes on to describe how, because he could not see well enough to join in ball games, he studied from an early age. He was brought up in a Christian home and never repudiated Christian interpretations of the Bible, but he did say that it should be studied in the context of history.
Albright has been described as the-

Father of biblical archaeology and the dean of American archaeologists
 working in the southern Levant from the 1920s through the 1960s.

And he was father in the sense that he passed on both his knowledge and enthusiasm. A number of his former students became leaders in their own right in the field of Biblical study and in archeology.
 Yet the same writer claims that the impact he made  upon archaeological methods can be described as negligible. So was Albright as great as has been claimed

Other workers
Although relatively well known because of his association with the amazing finds at Qumran in the 1940s, Albright was in fact only one of dozens of other leaders of archeological expeditions. These began in a small way when an attempt was made  in 1838 by Edward Robinson and Eli Smith  to identify biblical cities, using as their basis   modern day Arabic names. From the 1860s onwards Warren began searching in Jerusalem.Albright actually used for the most part methods already established by earlier workers, rather than developing new ways of working.

 It was the British archeologist Kathleen Kenyon who developed the idea of stratigraphy, which involved close examination of the soil under and around objects discovered. It was her method, which was more demanding upon the excavators that was used from the 1950s at very important sites such as Jerusalem and Jericho. It was based not upon instinct, but upon very careful analysis and interpretation of the materials found.

Albrights achievements.
In Bernard Andersons work of 1957 The Living World of the Old Testament the index has 17 citations  under the name W.F.Albright .This gives some indication of the amount  and range of his scholarly writing. For instance it is his opinion about the probable date of the Exodus that became widely accepted at the time.  Much of his writing is about the translation of ancient texts. He is known for instance for his views on the history of the word YHWH which  he said had it origins in Gods creative ability, a view accepted by some scholars, as Anderson describes.

His scholarly writing was wide ranging, as when he described the Canaanite religion in the ancient Syrian city of Ugarit. though it may be  in this case that he was only restating what others such as Pritchard had discovered about such very early texts, although Anderson does quote a translation by Albright.

He was prepared to argue with others when he felt that he was right as when he stood out about the dating of the Song of Deborah, and the battle of Megiddo.  Also with regard to the Biblical prophecy of Habakkuk Anderson describe how many scholars see the Psalm in chapter 3 as having been inserted by different writer, whereas Albright held out for a substantially unique authorship for the whole book, basing this upon the language used.

Work by Albright has been confirmed by later work, as when he evacuated King Sauls fortress at Gibeah,  in 1922-3 and found that the charismatic Israelite leader lived a very simple life, in a two story building built upon earlier foundations. His findings were confirmed by Paul Lapp who looked at the site again in 1964.

He was acknowledged as an expert upon links between the Bible and archeological findings because of his many writings, as when he wrote Archeology and the Religion of Israel.

Albright was able to study the group of artefacts known as the LMLK seals. He also performed many on-site excavations, the first being one of the most significant, when in 1923 he  was able to excavate a tumulus situated near Jerusalem, Israel.

Criticism of Albrights work.
Some recent archeologists have seemed to be trying to make a separation between the Biblical record and archeology, whereas Albright sought to prove the Bible from archeology. Archeologist William Denver has said Most people really think that archeology is out to prove the Bible. No archeologist thinks so. He has also said of Albright that -

Central theses (regarding the historicity of the Bible) have all been overturned, partly by further advances in biblical criticism, but mostly by the continuing archaeological research of younger Americans and Israelis to whom he
himself gave encouragement and momentum.

Despite such statements in Albrights case he was often able to confirm the Biblical record. It has been found by people such as Lapp that his archeology was correct. Having said that Metzer and Coogan in 1993 said that his identification of Tell Beit Mersim as Debir has been disputed. Debir  was the ancient fortress of one of the kings of the Amorites who were eventually defeated by Joshua at the time of the Israelite conquest of Canaan, . Despite this the Thompson Chain Bible marks it to the south west of Hebron as Albright said.  The Oxford Companion to the Bible has a similar map, so even when his findings are disputed they are accepted by at least some scholars.

Albrights were not the only person whose findings were disputed. The various different views caused much confusion in the mind of the public. In 1932 he wrote-

Small wonder that historians and Biblical scholars turned away from this chaos
 of conflicting views in despair, convinced that the main purpose of archaeology was to unearth inscriptions and occasionally to elucidate the arts and the crafts
of the ancient inhabitants.

Times have moved on in what Thomas described as The Shifting Sands of archeology. According to William Dever, as quoted by Thomas Davis,  staff needed for excavations in Bible lands  would no longer  ask the questions posed by the Bible and it associated archaeology, but those raised  American anthropology.

Conclusion
Albrights real claim to fame seems to have been not so much as a pure archeologist as in his skills in the Semitic group of languages. He was able, despite his faulty eyesight, to examine ancient texts and come to important conclusions. In some cases his findings clearly back up the literal Biblical record. It has now been almost 40 years since his death  and so perhaps it is time for a reassessment of his scholarly contribution.

There is ongoing work on the Dead Sea Scrolls, but apparently no doubts about Albrights original dating of the finds at between 200 BCE and 200 C.E. Archeologist Doctor Bryant Wood , one of the Associates for Biblical Research, has described the importance of the Dead Sea Scrolls. They are important because they are roughly 1000 years older than the previously known texts with which they can be compared. This means that they show how the Old Testament scriptures have been faithfully copied and carried forward down the years.

Albright was many things  all of them to high standards. He was a biblical scholar and historian, a linguist as well as being an archeologist and an expert in early ceramics. His careful scholarship meant he was able to merge the science of archaeology and his knowledge of the languages used in the Biblical countries with the ancient Biblical narratives, in several instances proving their historical accuracy. In 1964, when his active working life was drawing to its close, he described himself not as a biblical archaeologist, or even as archaeologist, but rather as an Orientalist. Since his day new methods have come in, often using modern day electronic devices that were unavailable to Albright. Despite this it is with good reason that his writings are described as authoritative.  During his life time  he received numerous awards including both honorary doctorates, and medals. All archeologists are scientists, but they all also work to some extent using their instincts when making choices  Albright it seems was one of the best at doing so, despite the fact that in more recent years his has received considerable adverse criticism. He did his best according to the skills, knowledge, methods, beliefs and attitudes of his time.  Dr Albright was able to bring Biblical archeology into the notice of the mainstream However it seems that, according to Thomas Davis, George Ernest Wright, a student of Albrights  has done work which could bring about the end of the kind of Bible based archeology Albright promoted so well. Despite all the negativism in 2004 Thomas Davis, who makes dozens of references to Albright in his book of that year, still felt able to write that Biblical archeology still has validity as a name for the sphere of interaction of archaeology and the Bible. G. Ernest Wright in 1982, described him as-
 
The dominant creative figure in the attempt to place the Bible in a
 perspective of the whole of ancient history.

Religious Fallacy in Pastor Skips Character

Saved, the United Artists 2004 religious comedy film that was directed by Brian Dannelly and produced by Michael Ohoven, Sandy Stern, Michael Stripe, and William Vince, delved on the norms on social acceptance that was prevailing in American Eagle Christian High School.  Being a conservative Christian school, the story then revolves around the character of Mary Cummings, which was portrayed by Jena Malone, specifically in her personal struggles that resulted from being impregnated out of wedlock.  The film, being filled with religious undertones on topics such as homosexuality, hypocrisy, religious ultra-fundamentalism, and outright biblical comedic cynicisms, takes on several societal dilemmas, of which Pastor Skip, played by Martin Donovan, becomes one of the more interesting subjects to be examined.  As principal and pastor of the aforementioned High School, it was evident that Pastor Skip had his own personal struggles to confront which had influenced his decisions in life, specifically on his son and his estranged wife, as was evidenced in several instances that clearly exhibited this reality.

Pastor Skip
As the film was centered on American Eagle Christian High School, its community was presented as the representation of the society.  This enhances Pastor Skips importance not only in the social structure of the community, but more significantly in the spiritual formation of the youth.  Although the film is a comedy in its entirety, the fact cannot be ignored that several lines in the film were blatant jabs at the prevailing situations in several ultra-conservative religious congregations.  One of these was Marys realistic and sagacious observation on the existing standards practiced by Pastor Skip So everything that doesnt fitwhat you think God wants, you just try to hide or fix or get rid of Its just all too much to live up to.  No one fits in one hundred percent of the time, not even you (Saved). 
As the story progressed, the audience is allowed to view Pastor Skip in a more human manner and with his inherent weaknesses, which are his personal struggles and his biases in his practice as a pastor.  Most evident of these is his apparent belief that every decision must be based on the Bible, even if there are circumstances that exceptions must be considered.  This was the main reason why his son, Patrick, seemed to be detached from him, as it was made to appear to the student populace that his wife is on a religious mission outside of the country, when in truth they are separated.  Perhaps this problem was the reason for the father and sons disagreement, wherein Pastor Skip remarked, The Bible is black and white (Saved).

For Pastor Skip, there is a clear demarcation line that separates good from bad righteousness from evil and biblical from worldly.  For him and his personal standards of Christianity, a society must conform to these standards at all times and at all costs.  Perhaps this would have not presented any problem in his character in the film if he had truly lived his life in accordance with his principles, but it was obvious that he possesses several shortcomings.  Two of these immediately present themselves after viewing the film.  One is his illicit relationship with Marys mother, that although she was a widow, he is still legally married to his wife.  Second is his abrupt and insensitive decision to expel Cassandra, who was the only Jew in the school, simply on the grounds presented by his favorite student, Hillary Faye.  Hence, based on these arguments, Pastor Skips definition of Christianity is in direct contrast to what he preaches.  For him, Christianity is an exclusive religion whose only concern should be limited to those who abide by the rules set by the Bible, according to his interpretation, and anyone who chose not to believe should be cast out. 

However, a particular scene seemed to suggest a transformation in the character of Pastor Skip.  This involved the scene wherein he was seen by Marys mom from the hospital window pacing back and forth, as if contemplating if he truly wanted to pursue her or simply forego with his emotions for her.  What is worth noting is the fact that the said scene occurred after the commotion had already happened in the prom, wherein finally, Hillary Fayes hypocrisy had been exposed, causing several of the students to question their religiosity.  As such, this scene represented the reconciliation of his previous ultra-conservative stance with the reality that certain things in life truly call for a compromise between austerity and lenience.  After all, social issues such as divorce and single parenthood had been in existence for countless ages.

Conclusion
Perhaps what God truly intends for mankind is to be faithful in His scriptures as they are to his fellow men.  Perhaps also this was the reason why laws on divorce and several other concerns were passed among hundreds of generations, from the Old Testament to the contemporary times. In this respect, it would definitely be conforming to the scriptures if Pastor Skip would be prioritizing to correct the problem within his family, and if situations would later prove to be irredeemable, to pursue his emotions towards Marys mother.  More importantly, the strictness of his religiosity should be more accommodating of human weaknesses, particularly in our failure to conform with the existing religious standards, as it was the Lord Jesus Himself who had said that He came not for the righteous but for the sinners, and overturning His tenet would be tantamount to spiritual fallacy. 

Book Review Applications for Christian Counseling

In McMinns 1996 book Psychology, Theology, and Spirituality in Christian Counseling, the author goes into detail about the theoretical and technical applications and interventions involved in the practice of counseling from a Christian perspective.  McMinn discusses bringing religion into the counseling office.  He asserts that religion is always addressed in counseling, in a variety of ways.  Religion is either presented as a negative force which should be removed from a clients life, as a positive force in which God is a helpful support in the life of the client, or as a negative force in which religion takes on a shaming role.  McMinn calls the readers attention to the psychological and spiritual health of the client as being interwoven.  From a Christian perspective, psychological and spiritual health is a given, an essential gift from God, and it is up to the client with the help of the counselor to find the path towards recognizing and appreciating spirituality as an element of psychological health.  Prayer serves to bring God closer to people personally, and clients can be aided in their goal to reach spiritual enlightenment by praying to God to help them find solutions.  Scripture can also be helpful in the lives of people wanting to find a deeper meaning and purpose in their lives, as the path to happiness is clearly explained within the Bible.  However, it is not always appropriate to discuss religious ideals with clients.  It should be up to the client whether or not he or she feels comfortable discussing particular aspects of religion.  Although people are disturbed by sin, suffering from personal decisions to break away from God, it is important to recognize that sin can only be overcome by acts of love and kindness.  Recognizing sin is important, but it is not up to counselors to point out the sins of their clients, and it does not serve any purpose for clients to fall into the gloom of guilt and shame.  In regard to the benefits of confession, it can be immensely helpful and relieving to share ones sins with another person, to give voice to the things one has done wrong.  However, it is also important to forgive and move forward in figuring out ways to make amends and rectify the situation as best as possible.  McMinn covers all of the basics in regard to how counselors should and need to address psychology, theology, and spirituality in Christian counseling.  Religion is always a topic of any counseling session, and it is up to the counselor to decide the best ways in which to address the ways in which God is present in the lives of clients.  McMinn offers a wide range of ideas and suggestions in response to people who are searching for an answer about how to address Christianity in the counseling office.

Response
In reading McMinns chapter entitled Toward Psychological and Spiritual Health, I was reminded of one of my own road trips with my family as a child.  My sisters and I were making too much noise in the back of the van, and my father pulled over, opened the back of the van, and slapped me, shouting at us to be quiet.  This is one of my most disturbing memories, and it made a profound impact on my life.  Having experienced a situation such as this was a learning experience for me, and it took a while for me to wrap my mind around the fact that I was not guilty, my father was.  My father was the one who sinned, not I.  He was the one who was raising me, and he made mistakes.  It was wrong of him to yell, to hit, to manage his own anger so poorly and to react to me in violence.  I think its important that sin be treated seriously, as it is an act which fragments tender social and familial relationships.  I think that it is important to feel remorse about sinful situations and to regard the incidents with honesty.  As a child, I felt guilty, as if I did something wrong.  I carried this guilt, which was also sinful, into my life as a young adult, until I finally recognized that I was not to blame.  My father was the one to blame.  And now, I feel comfortable in knowing what is wrong and right for me as a parent.  I feel liberated by seeing the sinful situation clearly and through forgiveness of both my father and myself.  I forgive him for hitting me, for yelling at me, and I forgive myself for feeling guilty and ashamed for so long for something which was not my fault.

Reflection
In reflecting on McMinns book, I think it is highly important for Christian counselors to keep in mind the importance of attributing sin to the precise people and situations.  McMinn addresses how it is important to regard oneself with respect to ones own sins.  However, given the relational nature of human social interaction, it is highly significant to discuss the ways in which the sins of others have an affect on the personal lives of clients.  Many people have problems in their lives, and many times, people are feeling guilty and ashamed, down trodden and helpless, because of the sins of other people (Isay, 2008).  It is important for counselors to see the world clearly, especially the ways in which family relationships create specific relational responsibilities.  One of the most important elements of the counseling relationship is to help clients figure out how sin, personal sin and sins of other people, are affecting their lives.  Without being precise about who, what, where, and when sin has occurred, there can be no honest step forward into forgiveness.

Action
In my own professional life as a Christian counselor, I want to be able to help people to honestly be able to recognize and attribute sin to the problems in their lives, whether the sin is their own or the sin of another person.  Most problems in the world are relational, and it is nearly impossible to consider oneself outside of the realm of how one is relating to others.  I want to be helpful in asking questions and guiding clients in their search to figure out the ways in which sins are affecting their lives.  When the sins of the client and the other people in the clients life are clearly described and honestly voiced by the client, only then it will be possible for the client to move forward in forgiveness and reconciliation, and be enabled to move closer in a relationship with God.

World problematic Religious Conflicts

Since ancient times, man has been known to be a religious being. Religion has always played a crucial role in a mans life. This is evidenced by the presence of so many religions in the world. Currently, the world hosts more than 2 billion Christians, Muslims numbering 1.5 billion, 900 million Hindus, 400 million Buddhists, 13 million Jews and lastly, 24 million Sikhs. These figures exclude the minor religious groups (New statesman, 2009). The world has brought these different faiths closer to each other and as a result, problems have ensued. Many negative effects of religion have emerged especially in relation to culture. By bringing all these faiths together, there is bound to be a clash of cultures.

Religion can play an important and positive role by helping people to understand each other, to work together for the good of humanity or it can be negative when misused to destroy, bring out differences between people and making people not to trust each other (New statesman, 2009). Some have argued that religion has done more harm than good and that it has cost man so much (Crabtree, 2010). The negative effects to the world have overshadowed the positive ones.

How has religion affected the world in a negative way
It has been argued that Atheists and scientists have never killed each other because of their beliefs but there is something about religion that makes it violent intolerant. So many times, people have defended their faith using violence leading to a lot of bloodshed and loss of lives. Some people have never allowed their religions to be questioned and thus consider it an offence the moment one does so. If two religious groups of such kind meet, there will be dangerous consequences (Crabtree, 2010).

Some religions are known to suppress their followers by subjecting them to a lot of scrutiny to make sure they believe in the right things. Recently, there has been a rise in sexual abuse cases especially in the Christian priesthood. Psychologists have come out to say that there is a relationship between religious fervor (extreme) and problems of psychosexual nature. The latter caused by the former. So many religions have negative attitude towards sexuality and thus most of them have overlooked the issue leading to the problem among their laymen. Hence the shocking trends of child abuse among the professional religionists. Just like ostrich, they have stuck their heads in the sand about adult sexuality leaving people not to be able to cope with their sexuality (Crabtree, 2010).

 Pedophilia is a major problem that is characterizing churches in the modern days. Strict teachings and restrictions in churches has led to sexual dysfunction and this applies mostly to priests in the Catholic Church. The church has tried to hide these from the world, tried to solve the issue by sending the priests to rehabilitation centers or even on sick leave but it has not solved the problem. The rate of sexual abuse in churches has really gone up in that, 3 of all priests are vulnerable to commit the offence against children (Crabtree, 2010).

In addition, some religions in the world have hard stance on contraceptives despite the many diseases threatening the existence of man, a good example being the Catholic Church. Others also have tolerated dominance over woman by man, for example Buddhists. The hard stance on abortion by these religions has not bore fruits. Studies show that, the countries that have enacted liberal laws on abortion have low rates of the practice but those which are strict record high cases of it (Crabtree, 2010).

Another negative effect of religion is the subjugation of women by some religious traditions. Some of these religions bar their women from taking any leadership post others prevent them from accessing secular education and sometimes even the religious ones. In some, such as in Islam, a woman is not supposed to speak in presence of men. These practices are mostly perpetuated by some superstitious beliefs about men and women. Amnesty International 2009 discovered that there was a retreat in the rights of women in Iran because of religion (Crabtree, 2010).

Religion is also known to have led to the clash of cultures in the world.  Different religions have different world views and thus discord can be associated with clashing world views. Samuel P. Hunington in his book, Clash of cultures, has stated that the worlds culture can be divided into seven main civilizations. These are Islamic, Slavic-Orthodox, Latin American Japanese, Confucian, Western and Hindu and Africa being another possible civilization. These Cultures or civilizations are defined by religion mostly (Graham, 2004). They are not to mingle with each other therefore cultivating intolerance towards one another leading to the clash of civilization. These cultures are different in so many ways which has led to conflicts that have generated into the worst violence the world has never seen before. People have become civilization conscious such that they want to retain their identity (de-westernized idea). There have always been conflicts between the Islamic culture and the Western one among others. Islam has always antagonized pagan animists and any one who went against them. Each of these cultures has taboos against each other (Avalos, 1999).

Clash of cultures is a world problem
Clash of cultures has become a world problem because when people start developing these de-westernizing ideas, it becomes very difficult to get them out of their heads (Avalos, 1999). A part from conflicts arising from the clash between Christianity and Islam, there are also those from other religions around the world. In India, a group has emerged called Shiv Shena, which is out to fight western values but it seems they are already loosing the battle. They are protesting against Valentines Day and those shops which are involved with selling flowers or greeting cards are being set on fire, young people who are seen walking, holding hands on this day, are beaten up by this group. This kind of hatred towards westernization is shared with police from Saudi Arabia (Farhat-Holzman, 2008).

In Malaysia which is considered a multi cultural country has Islam as the majoritys religion. This country is known to pretend that it can tolerate any other religion for example Hinduism and Christianity. Just recently, the world watched as Tamil Indians 200 houses, were being demolished by the state in a particular slum including their important temple. Tension continues to run high as the state is being turned into an Islam country. The Indians belonging to the upper class have to keep their heads down in order to survive in the country. This also applies to the Chinese in the country who are the minority and this is just because of fear (Farhat-Holzman, 2008).

In Thailand, a problem is cropping up concerning its Muslim minority group. Despite of it being the only Buddhist majority country that is modernized, it is having problems dealing with the Muslim radicals who have been influenced by Islamists but the Thais are not taking it lying down (Farhat-Holzman, 2008).

More over, being known to have bad history of religious conflicts, Russia is not exempted from these cultural clashes caused by religions. A new picture is being created and is considered not a good one. The number of Christians in the country is reducing day by day and the one of Muslims is increasing. The army is becoming more and more Islamic and this is considered a disaster in the making (Farhat-Holzman, 2008).

The Latinos have had their fair share of pain because of religion. Research has shown that, religious conflicts have led to more than hundred deaths over the years.  Guatemala and other Latino cities have been characterized by conflicts as a result of religious affiliations supporting different political parties. Differences have emerged because some religions have focused on social matters while others have concentrated on political ones. In the civilian war of 1960, 200,000 people were killed in Guatemala and most of them were Mayan Indians. This led to the crop of internal displaced people in the country while 250,000 children were orphaned (Cevallos, 2005).

These clashes of culture have been seen to affect the development of economy which can only take place when countries come together or cooperate. Due to them, there has developed economic blocks such as the European Community, the Central American Common Market and the North American Free Trade (Avalos, 1999). This has made people develop the idea of us against them which happens at two levels. The first one is called the micro level which involves violence, competition and territories principalities. The macro level occurs between states that compete for power regarding military and economy, in their efforts to propagate their values (Avalos, 1999). All these contrast the visions of politics globally (Fukuyama, 2006).

It has emerged that countries having different cultures are going their different ways and are forming alignments which are defined by culture. Political boundaries are based on religion and ethnicity and the differences in civilizations are becoming the lines of conflict in politics globally (Huntington, 1996).

After September 11 attack on world trade centre, it cannot be assumed anymore that it was an activity caused by a small group of people. It was actually an attack on values of the west (Rubenstein, 2005). This attack strengthened the debate on clash of cultures and thus global conflicts were related to the civilizations of Islam and western. Today, the universal hostility towards the western culture is attributed to Islam. The American government has tried to make distinctions between Islam and terrorism but in vain. This has affected how Muslims are treated in the nation because some people have leveled direct accusations against Muslims that they portend a great danger to the nation. This has made people question whether it is easy for a Muslim to live in the west (The centre of dialogue, 2006).
 
The main concern of the west regarding clash of cultures is the development of biological, nuclear and chemical weapons by the non-western countries which are very hostile to the west. These countries are said to be assisting and supporting each other by providing the weapons to fight the US and allies (Huntington, 1996). The increasing number of conflicts among countries in the middle East, the continent of India and Central Asia made the world fear that clashes in culture would overwhelm the world one day (The Centre For Dialogue,2006).

The factors that bring division between the West and the other cultures are crucial in the international agenda. It has emerged that the west is having problems to protect or defend its interest from non western societies. The long conflict between the west and the Muslim countries revolve around proliferation of weapons, democracy and human rights, oil control, terrorism, migration and western intervention. This conflict is seen as having to do with the rivalry from the historical times between the Christians and the Muslims, secular practices against religious values, Islam countries being jealous of western countries and their domination. Some have attributed this conflict to the humiliation of the Muslim countries and bitterness that develop when they compare the achievements of the two cultures (Huntington, 1996).

It has been argued that, civilizations do not control the states but the other way round. Several decades ago, two countries in the Middle East had their rule legitimized by using religion. These are Saudi Arabia and Iran but the former has always been American staunch ally while the latter has been an opponent. Civilization clash is said to be caused by unequal distribution of wealth, influence and power. This has led to antagonism between those who have and those who have not. Thus it can be said that the problem comes in when Muslim or Arab countries challenge the world order which is western supremacy (The Centre for Dialogue, 2006).

Religion is seen as the driving force behind these conflicts to the extent that policy makers always assume that anytime religion is involved, there is bound to be conflict. Religion is believed to bring people together and also causing tension (The Centre for Dialogue, 2006).

According to the Arab nations, the Arab-Israeli conflict is a religious conflict between infidel Jews as they are called and the Moslem. They use this ideology to mobilize all Muslims, Arabs and non Arabs to wage war against the Jews. In the modern world, radical Islam has declared war on western culture by using terrorism on the basis of religion. There have been attacks by suicide bombers and suicide crews for example those who attacked the World Trade Centre in September 11. These are the modern clash of civilizations. Israel is the main victim of this because it is the main country in the Middle East which propagates the Western civilization. This did not start just recently, from history there have been persecutions of non Muslims in the Arab countries. Islam religion has proved to be intolerable towards other religions or cultures (Hama, 1994).

Predictions on clash of cultures
The conflicts as a result of religious cultures will become more in the future in that greater divisions will emerge among humankind with the main cause being clash of cultures at macro level. Conflict will occur between countries with different cultures and they will fight to take over control of international institutions and power in regards to economy and military thus conflict ensuing (Graham, 2004). It has also been predicted that Islam and Sinic cultures will come together in the future against their common enemy, the West (Hendrickson, 1996). It is also said that the Western culture will remain to be dominant in early 21 century but later, this dominance will be shared among cultures. If the population of Muslims continues to grow, it will be a destabilizing one for all the societies including Muslims and their neighbors. There will be growth of Muslim militancy, resurgence and migration. The future clashes are to result from the interaction of intolerance of the Muslims, the western feelings of arrogance and the assertiveness of the Sinic culture (Hunington, 1996).

In conclusion, religion is seen to be a major cause of these cultural clashes because cultures are divided along religious lines. From history, the world has been grappling with the negative effects of these cultural clashes and it continues to do so. It has become a major world problem because it threatens the existence of man. From the predictions, it seems that these clashes are not near to an end so the world has to brace itself for more conflicts due to these clashes.

Science and Religion

THE EXISTENCE OF GOD
There have been many arguments from various circles on the topic of whether God is there and He exists or otherwise. The arguments are always directed to the class of people who are believers of God from the non believers. The quest on what to believe will and shall remain a subject and a born of contention as long as the two camps exists. The concern about the existence of God and the question whether indeed and in fact there is God dates as back as the tangle that has been and is here today on evolution and creation. Both existence of a god and that of creation are closely likened in contention.

Bible scholars and science scholars have always waged war and hot debates on facts relating to creation as well as existence of God. One camp expressing that there is no God that everything as we see it today has undergone channels of evolution to date and the other camp arguing for the hand of a supreme being God being the creator, a craftsman who would make create things as he pleases and designing responsibilities according to his only wish. Dating from hundreds and thousands years ago, there had been volumes of books whose scripts have been protected hence passed from generation to generation talking about no evolution but of a God who is believed to be the only and one Mighty God in judge of the earth and whatever that is bellow the sky. The Bible is one such document with stories and theories of ancient writings depicting the most powerful and eminent powers and where such powers come from.

The physical constants are described by scientist to be holding live and supporting live but there is very little to explain how such constants came to being and position themselves so productively and importantly in supporting live itself on the universe. The constants that supports live in the universe such as sun and rain. Life evolve around this two very important elements be it that of human, plants, sea live and almost every living creature and plant depend on sun and rain either directly or indirectly. Some would use rain and sun to help get food or break up food during feeding while others need either of the two or both sun and rain to be born.  Although science tries to explain how this two come about, there is left a lot to explain on the existence of the two and there relevance to live on the universe. These constants and other live supporting agents would spell doom for live on the universe with science or without rain which is a major source of water, sun from the skies. Peter Lynds, (2007) in his physics law of thermodynamic he explains on why we have events evolving as they are now one time direction in nature. 

Energy transfer disperses from hot flows to cold and not reverses and that the transfer tends to have a one direction. In his explanation however, there is a question on the flow theory what if it was unable to pass to colder and instead because of some physical conditions it was forced to flow to hotter The obvious reasoning would be any live would be extinct because we do not have any living life that would survive or that requires hot temperatures for survival. It would be a huge scientific coincidence that events such as temperature regulation would just happen like so naturally without some supreme powers in guard of live.

THE EXISTENCE OF GOD AND THE UNIVERSE
Either this apparent fine-tuning is just lucky and has no deeper explanation or it has some deeper explanation

The existence of God and all that surrounds us is evident and at times imaging and re-looking at every other feature living creatures and non living all strategically positioned where they are and occupying their rightful position acts as a pointer to some further powers and spirits just beyond human understanding and discovery.  The bible tells stories about creation and how God created everything we see and that which we do not see by our naked eyes. He God skilfully designed the skies, the seas and waters in the Holy Bible, book of Genesis chapters one and two. The process of creation is thought by the Bible writer as beautiful and gracefully crafted and satisfying to the creator himself. Reading through this book of Genesis would be evident enough to rule out any misconception from either divide of learners and teachers that the precision of our universe is not the result of an accident but rather a product of a meticulous Creator and a Law Giver and definer, a Mighty planner and an intelligent God.

Science has been finding it difficult to overcome the quest for a power that would be evident in explaining why what we wee around us is the way it is because God cannot be detected, measured by physical means using scientific machinery or chemicals. This has led to the scientific community to rather ignore or prejudice unwarranted views and many ignoring the existence of God while the evidence is in plain sight. In centuries, philosophers have tried to answer the questions regarding the existence mankind and his place in the universe. Their forward approach is that there can be there no God or a divine creator and thus leaving no room for them to look at things in otherwise. But it is unrealistic to believe one who has come through the process of creation to divine his existence for all are using mans ability to rediscover and understand themselves and thus concluding that the universe just came from nothing and that live evolved from lifeless matter.

Dawkins (1997-2002) says that clearly that there is believe on religion and God. This would mean that he believes there is both God and religion although he clarifies that religion is not God. Although a biologist a scientist, Dawkins recognizes an understanding of spiritual experience of knowing God that changes a life to one of love and service the same sentiments that are expressed in the holy books or scriptures e.g. Mathew chapter 23 which gives an insight picture of true worship of God and in relationship of Love with God as a person. Use Dawkins logic on religion and you might as well also throw out science just because there are some scientists who fall short of the disciplines of science, abuse science to justify their own selfish agendas and similarly damage and mislead others in the process.

Although in general most non scientists and some scientists support the idea that there is God who serves as an explanation as to reason on how things are the way they are, but those still left in the middle feel there should be more to and some sort of explanation regarding most situations and happenings that happen in everyday life. For instance, the occurrence of accidents, the diseases that has brought so much suffering to people. This are some happenings which puts everything in contention that if indeed there is a God who is described to be having a lot of love and who wouldnt want to see His people suffer. Such class of people given the happenings would require more explanation as to why unfortunate happenings do happen even after circumscribing in God. If God exists, either is completely unaware of mankinds existence or doesnt care one bit about it at all, one way or the other. And so those worshipping are as misguided as the lowest primitives worshipping a dead stone idol those are some arguments which are aired and for this to be understood, there should be further inner understanding about the existence of God and an explanation on why such happenings do happen the way they do. The explanation here should be both on God and the devil.

God Exists
In many ways through many explanations from believers, God does exist. If we followed what scientists teach their theories would have led to the world being wound up or evolution did it stop and at what point did it stop Those are some questions which are never answered instead research is claimed to be underway to discover what already exists after which it is said to be a breakthrough. While the teachings from the holy books suggest of a live a universe that was designed to the creator likes and love. The Bible (1 Corinthians 1227) says that we are the Body of Christ and individually Members of it. Speaking the Truth in Love we are to grow up in all ways into the Head into Christ. In (Ephesians 415) scientifically says That which has been will be again and that which has been done will be done again there is nothing new under the Sun.  A prove on Gods existence in heaven in judge of us all and the entire world.

The very idea of creation suggests that there must be a creator the idea that there is matter suggests that there must be a Spirit and the presence of changing phenomena suggests there must be an unchanging phenomenon. The very idea of a changing mind and thinking suggests that there must be an unchanging witness and a controller God for the same mind and phenomenon. There had been perfect law even before science that controls people and that makes people live in harmony in the universe it is not a coincidence, there must be a controller for this universe who must be omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent.

What is the multi-verse reply to the fine-tuning argument Is it a sound reply
The argument about the existence of some force, some powerful spirit or a might person with powers to change and control the universe exists to date amid the discoveries scientists purport to have made. The universe seems constant, controlled and recreating yearly, daily, monthly and hourly and it is so doing because of some great and powerful individual who is in control and doing all this to have his creatures and nature survive from perish.

With the universe being what it is and being able to be just the way it is leaves a lot to be answered. Others believe that the universe is just what it is and that there shouldnt be any explanation about it since it would still be this way it is even without there presence. I belong to those who think otherwise. It has the owner who is omnipotent and omnipresent and he perfectly manipulates it for us to fit in according to his desire and will. Everything is perfectly in place and relevant in a way to serve and have a purpose on the universe. So, how would everything be so perfect Instead of being in ewe of the perfection we worship him and imagine nothing not us not the universe would be present without him the Perfectionist to have everything just the way He desires and so even when we write about Him we crown the writing denoting Him in capital for nothing but to realize that we are talking about a powerful and worshiped God.

Spread of Christianity, Buddhism and Islam

The development of the three major universal religions, that is, Christianity, Buddhism and Islam has changed over time. The main concern is to explore how converts, missionaries, trade and pilgrims enhanced the spread of diverse practices and beliefs of the religions. The new faith was spread to state rulers, travellers, merchants and local communities who were ready to promote and adopt the new religions. It is noted that some of the means the religions claim to have used in the spread of their faith is questionable such as adopting local beliefs and use of written materials.

New beliefs and practices were introduced to a wide variety of people by the spread of Christianity, Buddhism and Islam. Diverse people were integrated through a common bond with Christianity, Buddhism and Islam being the influential and spreading across the frontiers and borders of Afro-Eurasia to Middle East. The conversion to any of the three universal religions was enhanced by the capacity of each to adapt to the local situations. The development of the religions took place at different places and period in  time but they share some commonalities in the means of expansion whereby they spread across the frontiers and borders is a result of trade, pilgrims and missionaries (Jerry, 1993, pp. 67). In the 16th century, Buddhism emerged in South Asia. It had spread to China by 200 BCE and in the following centuries it spread to Southeast Asia by maritime routes. Christianity was starting to spread in the Mediterranean at the same time the Buddhism was connecting Southeast Asia to China. The time Islam was emerging and starting its expansion across the Arabian Peninsula, Christianity had already been established through Africa and Western Europe. It is found out that, despite the challenges in some of the expansion means faced, the universal religions have spread widely from their origins.

Buddhism
The first Buddhist community in India is not well indicated when it was established. The religion was promulgated across India by the grandson of Mauryan dynasty founder.  The teachings were also spread by Buddha followers after his death into northern India through trade routes to the East and west. Moreover the religion spread to other places such as China which was enhanced by the establishment of the Silk Road in the second century BC, whereby pilgrims and missionaries started to travel between India, China and central Asia (Valerie, 1998, pp. 40). The mobility aided by the Silk Road was first taken advantage of by Buddhism missionary faith hence the religion spread beyond its native grounds. By the first century BC, Buddhism had spread to Pakistan and Afghanistan. The spread was aided by the establishment of temples and shrines whereby Monks and Priests preached to the passing traveller and local populations hence the faith spread rapidly. The Monks were ready to adopt and adapt local beliefs hence so many people accepted their teachings. Buddhism had written texts translated into local languages hence the converts who made pilgrimages to visit the land where Buddha lived were given the texts hence became influential in the expansion of the religion. At the same time, establishment of   Christianity was taking place in the western parts of the Silk Road which was transformed from a local phenomenon into a rapidly growing and proselytizing religion through the work of Paul and Christian apostles.  Nestorian Christianity by 635 had spread through out Persia and India hence reaching the heart of China. Also the many of the churches were found along the Silk Road by mid 7th century.

Christianity
It is noted that spread of Christianity started six centuries after Buddhism. Christianity was able to adapt to local beliefs, traditions and sacred places just like Buddhism hence won appeal among many people. After the death of Jesus, the religion gained support after the Roman emperor Constantine was converted in 312 CE. Trade routes in Asia, Europe and North Africa aided the rapid spread of Christianity. Some of the converts such as Charlemagne and Prince Vladimir of Russia were responsible for the aggressive expansion of Christianity. It is considered that almost everyone in Europe had been converted to Christianity by the end of the first millennium (Ramsay, 1984, pp. 87).

Islam
Islam started in Arabian Peninsula six centuries after Christianity began. The spread of Islam began after the death of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. Muslims community was developed in the Arabian Peninsula during Muhammad lifetime through conversion to Islam. Dynasties in Muslim were developed and subsequent empires in India and Persia were among the powerful and the largest in the world. The Islamic world consisted of many sophisticated centres of science and culture with broad mercantile networks, scientists, travellers, mathematicians, doctors, astronomers and philosophers who contributed to the Islamic Golden Age (Richard, 1990, pp. 39).  The Muslim faith spread through missionaries and trade just like Christianity and Buddhism. Missionaries known as Sufis translated Islam message into local people whereby they had spread along the trade routes. Pilgrimages in Islam were also significant just like in the case of Buddhism whereby those who visited the holy places of Islam their faith was renewed and brought texts back home hence enhancing the spread of the Islam faith.  Islam spread as far as from Mecca, China and Indonesia.

Indonesian archipelago people are thought to be the first to adopt Islam during the eleventh century though it is believed that Muslims had visited the place earlier in the Muslim era. Through conversion, Islam by the end of the 16th century had overtaken Buddhism as dominating religion of Sumatra and Java people.  Christianity and Islam were adopted by the people in the eastern islands in the 17th and 18th century that had largely remained animist. The increasing trade connections outside Archipelago enhanced the spread of Islam whereby the new religion was first adopted by the major kingdoms and traders and today Indonesia has the largest Muslim population in the world. Islam is the second largest religion worldwide with population ranging from 1.1 billion to 1.9 billion Muslims. By the 7th century, the rise of Islam challenged the spread of Buddhism and Christianity whereby today it is the dominant religion in the countries linked by the old Silk Road. The Islam conversion stated on the 8th century in central Asia whereby the Buddhist wall paintings and statutes were destroyed and its stupas and temples were abandoned and forgotten which led to the decline of Buddhism. The entire central Asian basin had already been converted into Islam by 15th century. The Islam development was enhanced by the establishment of mosques and it is considered that in human history no other religion has rapidly spread so far like Islam.

Conclusion
Despite the different places and period in time the three universal religions spread across. The fact remains that they used the same means in the development of their faith. The willingness of the religions to change through incorporating and adapting the beliefs and traditions of the local communities boosted the spread of their faith but the extent to which they did it is questionable since there was a possibility of compromising the religions faith. Use of written materials as a means of spreading the word by that time is also questionable since people were not civilized and how many people had the reading skills Trade, pilgrimages and religious interpreters were the best means of spreading the religions for many people could participate and understand hence they are the reason behind the extraordinary success of the three religions.

Mr. Ives Christmas

Reading through the book Mr. Ives Christmas, there were three major events in Mr. Edward Ives story which had effects on his faith to the divine love of God.

First of those three important events is the day when Mr. Ives was adopted by a widower. It was Christmas when Mr. Edward Ives was left as a baby on the doorstep of an orphanage and it was also on the same occasion that he was adopted by a widower who treated him like a real son. His adoptive father raised him up to be a good Christian, exposing him to daily masses, teaching him the practices and devotions of Catholic living.

This event is important to the foundation of his Catholic faith, because this was the time when Ives felt that life is still worth living. The idea of being neglected when he was still a kid was erased by the thought that there was this person who wanted to love and to take care of him, though they are not related in consanguinity. The positive act that he received from his adoptive father also brought out positive outlook in him and thus being good to other people became automatic from him. We may also consider the day Ivesson was murdered as the second major event. It was also in Christmas day when his 17-year old was murdered. It was an event in his life that tested his faith to the ground. For Mr. Ives who devoted his life being a righteous follower of God, it seemed unfair to him that his son was taken away from him just like that. He spent more time in church praying to God to bring forgiveness to his heart, because the rage that he felt for the murderer of his son is slowly deteriorating him inside. It was very difficult for him to still be righteous while the other half of him is full of anger for the man who caused Roberts death.

With the condition of Ives heart towards the incident, he became insensitive of the feelings of the people around him. His marriage, just like his own self, was placed on the rocks after his sons death. For his wife Annie, Ives endless mourning for Robert is no longer understandable. She already lost her son, and it seems to her that she is slowly losing his husband as well. And it came to the point when they began to drift apart. Finally, the day Ives finally forgave the murderer can be categorized as a major episode in Ives story. In the book, it was stated that Ives tried to resist the anger he felt on Danny Gomez, the person who murdered his son. He went to see Dannys family he began sending Danny letters and reading materials in prison. Ives was aware of what his anger to that person has done to him and to his marriage that is why he kept on fighting against it with a reverse psychology method. Instead of letting the anger dig into him, he tried to use it to still be on Gods path.

It is known that when Jesus, God the son, was crucified and was almost near death, He turned to the heavens and spoke Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing
Using this analogy, Ives way of laying his cards down and open-heartedly forgiven his sons killer uses the same ideology as to how Jesus accepted his fate and still defended the peoples ignorance of uprightness.  At first it was not easy for Ives, but since he did not refuse God in his heart, he still managed to forgive that man no matter how bad he is. 

Also, the renewal of Ives faith after experiencing the spiritual crisis he had was interpreted in his dream where his son was pouring water to him with his hands, and when he woke up, he felt new.  God the Holy Spirit helped him breathe a new life after the dark phase in his life.

To forgive and to forget are the most difficult thing to do for all humans. In Mr. Ives case, it was evident in the text that he was in so much struggle trying to fight the humanly rage that he was feeling toward the murderer. But God, in his three identities as the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, will not leave you empty handed. Trials may come and go to test our faith to the one God who loves us all unconditionally.

Like God, Mr. Ives had experienced his life, death and resurrection during the whole time he has been with Gods ways. Thus, one can prove that God is always on our side in every ups and downs that we encounter. For as long as we allow God in our lives just like what Mr. Ives did, you will never feel isolated for long. For Gods community is based on love divine community of God the Father, God the son and God the Holy Spirit, who all live in love with one another.

Women in Early Judaism

The Virgin Mary, the mother of God remains to have a noteworthy role in the history of Christianity, whether it was from the perspective of the Catholic or the Protestant faith. The critical issue considered when it came to the discussion about Mary was not about her significance.  Instead, it was in the debate about the veneration and honor that was due to her, in accordance to the will of God.  There was the question as to how Mary should be perceived in accordance to what the Holy Scripture required.  It was already established that Gods self-revelation could occur through historical studies.  In the development of the studies of Christology, scholarship evolved and included an exploration of the historical life of Mary, which could be done in the same location and period as of Christ.

The Canonical Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John placed Mary in the same locations where Jesus was from the time of his birth and at different points of his ministry on Earth. Through a historical construction of the life of Mary, many Christians were able to relate to her, not as a heavenly creature, but as a persona whom they could share their lives with in their Earthly struggle.   The discoveries about the life that Mary led, as highlighted by the context of the traditional Jewish culture she experienced, a historical analysis of the life of Mary guided understanding of Christian faith and praxis, which could be described as contextual theologies. 

First Century Rabinnic Tradition
This section will discuss about the culture that Jewish women were exposed to in the first century of Rabbinic tradition. There was limited certainty as to the life of Jewish women in the time that Mary was born in.  There was little known about Jewish women preceding the emergence of Christianity, as few ancient sources were preserved.  Thus, the surviving sources failed to provide the necessary elements to present a full biography of a single Jewish woman in the time of Mary, during the Greco-Roman antiquity. It was important to piece together different chunks of what was known about the social, economic and religious life of women during that time.

Geographical Setting
Galilee could be located in the northern part of the ancient land of Israel, wherein it was the distinct region Judea in the south.  It had hilly ranges that surround that land that could be described like stripes that went from East to West.

Nazareth was a village that Christian theologians focus much interest in.  It was located in southern Galilee. Archeological remains revealed farming as the main occupation. This showed that inhabitants of Nazareth were either peasants who worked the land, tenant farmers or craft persons. There was also no wealth that were uncovered in this village, as there were no public paved roads, no decorative mosaics, nor any luxury items.  It seemed like a small village of no special importance, except for the fact that Jesus grew up there.  Furthermore, Mary, his mother, spent most of her life in this village as well.

Since Galilee was a multilingual society, different languages were used Latin was the native tongue of the Romans, Greek was the language used by the educated and ruling classes, Hebrew was the ancient language of the Bible by which the Torah scrolls were read, the every day and ordinary language was Aramaic. Jesus, like Mary spoke Aramaic with a Galilean accent.  In an instance in the book of Matthew, Peter was recognized to be a Galilean because of his accent.  Mary also resided in a village wherein the inhabitants had fair-hair, blue eyes and svelte figure with Semitic features, according to the depiction of Western art. Biblical scholars also found Mary to have a strong body that was shaped by the routines of hard daily labors.

Socioeconomic Setting
Women, like most men, ordinarily received little formal education despite the traditional image of Jewish men to be highly educated.  Social status was still placed a critical role when it came to the determination as to how much formal education a Jew received and what sort. There were still fewer women than men that were educated to learn letters.

The rite of passage for majority of women in antiquity became an adult, in the sociological and physiological sense, when they had heterosexual intercourse and children.  For women who were considered free, like Mary, this meant the woman would enter into a socially validated arrangement.  Mary experienced being betrothed, as a part of a common social custom during that time.  However, while most people entered into licit marriage through a public declaration of the matrimonial agreement, they also practiced signing pre-nuptial contracts called the ketubbah.

In relation to marital customs, there was also a formal divorce document that was available for Jews in this period, as proven by several papyrus artifacts of this document that survived.  It was harder to assess the differences in circumstances for Jewish women that were enslaved.  Mary was not a slave and it would be irrelevant to analyze further how social customs applied to enslaved Jewish women.

Most Jewish women during that time either married or not, would enter into an active sexual and reproductive life at a young age, from 12 to 18 years old.  Most of their marriages would be with older men.  Thus, women who would not experience death at a young age, usually due to child birth, could experience being widowed and would enter into other marriages. Nevertheless, families commonly arranged first marriages.  While women negotiated subsequent marriages, especially when their fathers were already dead.

Jews and Gentiles alike placed a heavy cultural, as well as economic value on virginity for women entering into their first marriages.  Fathers paid close attention to preserving their daughters virginity.  Virgin daughters were often closely guarded.

Most of the time, marriage contracts specified virginity as a requirement, thus if a woman was found to be a non-virgin by her husband upon their first marital contact, the marriage contract could be nullified.  This would highlight the grace of God upon Mary and Josephs union. In the absence of the dream and the revelation to Joseph of the plans of God with Mary and her unborn child, Jesus, he had the right to nullify his engagement with Mary.  Since newly-wed men could divorce their wives based on non-virginity, Joseph who was just engaged with Mary during that time could certainly get out of any marital agreement.

The basic chronology of Jesus life would reveal how they have witnessed and experienced the destruction of villages and the enslavement of its inhabitants during the time of Herod and even after his death. While this was not recorded in history, there were indications that as young as 15 or 16 years old, Mary was a married woman with a young child. Mary had to face the depredations of the rampaging Roman legions and experienced direct or indirect terrors from such destructions. Since the so-called holy family had little to begin with, Mary became no stranger to violence and social disruption. Since Mary occupied the lower rung of societys social ladder, Marys life was lived in an economically poor and oppressed, peasant Jewish culture.

Religious Life of Jewish Women
Similar to non-Jewish women, they were confined by a patriarchal culture to the domestic realm.  They were often secluded at home and wore veils when they were seen in public. Menstrual impurity excluded women from participating in the activities of the synagogue.  Furthermore, they could not inherit or initiate divorce proceedings, and they were betrothed with men that were chosen by their fathers at puberty, with little regard to their own desires.  There was also no evidence that showed that women were allowed to be disciples of Rabbis and travel with them, before the time of Jesus.  Thus, this made Jesus relationship with women to be radical given the restrictive context for women during that time.

The life, teachings and ministry of Jesus were saturated with Jewish customs and beliefs that could not be comprehended apart from understanding Judaism.  This was reason to believe that Mary and her husband ran an observant household, which meant the years of their lives were filled with daily prayer, weekly Sabbath observance and occasional festival pilgrimages in the Temple of Jerusalem.  It could be concluded that Mary of Nazareth lived and died as a faithful Jew.  The last mention of Mary in the New Testament revealed her praying with the disciples as they assembled after Jesus death in the Book of Acts. 

Marys virgin birth was viewed to be important part in the construction of the life of Jesus and his ministry. Despite the fact that Mary lived at a time wherein society was structured to be patriarchal in nature, being the mother of Jesus attributed an important role to women in her time, which could be perceived as a critical role in the religious sector of society.   Nevertheless, Marys faith was shaped by Jewish belief and trusted the God of Israel when she gave herself to the will of God, when she had borne the child Jesus. The early church of Christianity that developed years after the death of Christ did not shape it.  Thus, her faith was molded in the cusp between the two world religions.

Rabbinic Tradition as it Relates to Mary
A review of social context that Mary experienced showed that female virginity was both praised by male ecclesial authorities.  In the case of Mary, she was model virgin because it symbolized purity and a sinless life.  A virginal lifestyle was honored as holy, yet women during that time commonly practiced this within their households. However, Christian writers still attributed to Mary the honor of being a model virgin. Catholic writers praised her for redeeming the sin of the disobedient Eve through her obedient virginity (Irenaeus of Lyons) and for achieving the state of original purity that was intended for men (Ambrose of Milan).  Mary had become the model of obedient virgin, who was submissive to the divine.  Non-canonical texts such as, History of the Blessed Virgin and The Miracles of Mary pointed towards the perpetual virginity of Mary through miraculous proofs that supported it. 

This context provided an important implication when it came to the conflict that Joseph experienced, upon discovering that Mary was pregnant with a child, when they have yet to have marital relations.  Since virginity was often a requirement for when it came to marriage contracts, Marys pregnancy represented a violation of this agreement based on human logical reason. It was because of the divine revelation of the purpose of Marys immaculate conception of Jesus that Joseph submitted to the will of God.

Virginity was the symbol of receptivity it signified the integrity of her spirit and her absorption of God when she surrendered to His will. Thus, in her cooperation with grace, she experienced grace after grace.  As the socioeonomic and political environment of her time presented, it seemed that the grace of God was needed in order to survive the different struggles she faced in her life.  The lowliness of Marys circumstances, from being poor, being pregnant while still a virgin and everything else that was going on in the sociopolitical background of her time connoted affliction and oppression.  Despite this, she was able to exult God with joy in her spirit.  She represented the nature of God and how he was to those who suffer from humiliation and hunger.

As a first-century Jewish woman of faith who responded full-heartedly to the Spirit, Mary is a friend of God and prophet who belongs in this company of grace. In no way does this placement among the friends of God and prophets diminish her unique historic vocation to be the mother of the Messiah or the specific grace that accompanies this vocation. It remains true, however, that a womans maternal function does not exhaust her identity as a person before God. While honoring her unique relationship with Jesus, therefore, relating to Mary as truly our sister within the communion of saints refocuses her significance for the church today in terms of her whole graced life lived before God.