How Should We Construct a Responsible Criticism of Radical Postmodernism

The term postmodernism conforms more closely to a way of living and being than to any impalpable concept. Exegesis of this term calls for a veritable loyalty to putative means that are not based merely on hypothetical senses. When it comes to critiquing radical postmodernism, we must develop a methodology which will investigate thoroughly into the political notions about reality and truth as being partially real or ideologically instigated.

Moreover, the western patriarchal worldviews on modernism are constantly being put to test by radical assaults on the rationale that every aspect of art can be clearly outlined and that gender roles can be typically related to a hierarchical system that places women at the bottom. Quite extraordinarily, the tendency to over simplify or complicate the tenets of postmodernism has given birth to numerous offshoots having composite overlapping on one another.

Ranging from cultural contexts to social decrees, radical postmodernism encompasses a broad spectrum of philosophical moot points that require special attention for the purpose of decoding. Recurrent confusions about the correlation between generic socialism and collective individualism, subjectivity of language and objectivity of expressions, gender identities and racial discriminations and so on are to be disposed of in order to arrive at a unitary reference framework of radical postmodernism. Approaching the task haphazardly may make the process all the more intelligible, generating a meta-discourse of dissociative elements.

0 comments:

Post a Comment